Message-ID: <c62985530812231857l17362f94k271b66abbe7d7099@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Dec 2008 03:57:29 +0100
From:	"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing/ftrace: don't trace on early stage of secondary cpu boot

2008/12/24 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>:
>
> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
>> Impact: fix a crash/hard reboot while enabling cpu on runtime
>>
>> On some archs, the boot of a secondary cpu can have an early fragile state.
>> On x86-64, the pda is not initialized on the first stage of a cpu boot but
>> it is needed to get the cpu number and the current task pointer. These datas
>> are needed during tracing. As they were dereferenced at this stage, we got a
>> crash while turning on a cpu on runtime while tracing.
>>
>> Some other archs like ia64 can have such kind of issue too.
>>
>> This patch implements a function to verify if the cpu has been correctly initialized
>> before tracing it. By default, the check does nothing but archs can override it (as does
>> x86-64 in this patch).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c |   13 +++++++++++++
>>  include/linux/ftrace.h   |    8 ++++++++
>>  kernel/trace/ftrace.c    |    6 ++++++
>>  kernel/trace/trace.c     |    6 +++---
>>  4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
>> index 1b43086..7693c53 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
>> @@ -24,6 +24,19 @@
>>  #include <asm/nmi.h>
>>
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> +/*
>> + * A cpu doesn't want to be traced if pda hasn't yet been initialized.
>> + * Pda contains the cpu number and current task pointer. A lot
>> + * of functions use them, not only ftrace.
>> + * We use stack_smp_processor_id() here to avoid using the pda.
>> + */
>> +bool ftrace_in_early_cpuinit(void)
>> +{
>> +     return !cpu_isset(stack_smp_processor_id(), cpu_online_map);
>> +}
>> +#endif
>
> Is there something lighter weight than this? This is called during the
> function tracer and that is called at ever function. I would also rather
> this be an inline function defined in asm/ftrace.h if possible.
>
>> +
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
>>
>>  union ftrace_code_union {
>> diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace.h b/include/linux/ftrace.h
>> index 677432b..9a86e3d 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h
>> @@ -78,6 +78,14 @@ void clear_ftrace_function(void);
>>
>>  extern void ftrace_stub(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1);
>>
>> +/*
>> + * On some archs, the secondary cpu boot is sometimes fragile.
>> + * Some important datas could be not yet initialized. In such states,
>> + * tracing is too dangerous and we use this function to detect these
>> + * kinds of context. Archs which have this sort of issues can override it.
>> + */
>> +extern bool ftrace_in_early_cpuinit(void);
>> +
>>  #else /* !CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER */
>>  # define register_ftrace_function(ops) do { } while (0)
>>  # define unregister_ftrace_function(ops) do { } while (0)
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> index 2f32969..463e1eb 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> @@ -1962,6 +1962,12 @@ ftrace_enable_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>>       return ret;
>>  }
>>
>> +/* Overriden by archs if needed */
>> +bool __attribute__((weak)) ftrace_in_early_cpuinit(void)
>> +{
>> +     return false;
>> +}
>> +
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
>>
>>  static atomic_t ftrace_graph_active;
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
>> index b07e34e..1ac9b98 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
>> @@ -1175,7 +1175,7 @@ function_trace_call_preempt_only(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip)
>>       int cpu, resched;
>>       int pc;
>>
>> -     if (unlikely(!ftrace_function_enabled))
>> +     if (unlikely(!ftrace_function_enabled || ftrace_in_early_cpuinit()))
>>               return;
>>
>>       pc = preempt_count();
>> @@ -1202,7 +1202,7 @@ function_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip)
>>       int cpu;
>>       int pc;
>>
>> -     if (unlikely(!ftrace_function_enabled))
>> +     if (unlikely(!ftrace_function_enabled || ftrace_in_early_cpuinit()))
>>               return;
>>
>>       /*
>> @@ -1233,7 +1233,7 @@ int trace_graph_entry(struct ftrace_graph_ent *trace)
>>       int cpu;
>>       int pc;
>>
>> -     if (!ftrace_trace_task(current))
>> +     if (!ftrace_trace_task(current) || ftrace_in_early_cpuinit())
>>               return 0;
>
> Actually, didn't you say current is not available either? We are testing
> current first.
>
> I still wonder if there's a better way to find out if it is safe to run.
> Perhaps the arch code can test the %gs register to see if it is actually
> something valid?


One other solution, would be to define raw_smp_processor_id() to
stack_smp_processor_id() and current to
cpu_pda(stack_smp_processor_id()) if function_tracer is configured.
That would even let one to trace those cpu boot
functions.

But the other side effect with this is that perhaps "current" would be
retrieved with one pointer more to dereference....
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists