linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH for -tip] irq: for_each_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081225164921.GA28464@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 25 Dec 2008 17:49:21 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for -tip] irq: for_each_irq_desc() makes simplify


* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> > > > > +#include <linux/irq.h>
> > > > 
> > > > looks good, but linux/irq.h cannot be included on all architectures. (for 
> > > > example s390 has no notion of 'hardirqs'). But we created linux/irqnr.h 
> > > > for this purpose - so including that should work better.
> > > 
> > > Oh, thanks good explain.
> > > I'll fix soon.
> > 
> > next spin is here.
> > I confirmed three architecture.
> > 
> >  1. alpha (without SPARSE_IRQ, build test by cross compiler only)
> >  2. ia64 (without SPARSE_IRQ)
> >  3. x86_64 (with SPARSE_IRQ)
> 
> 
> Is this good idea?
> this patch also tested on above three architecture.

yes, this is a nice cleanup too!

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/