linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.6.1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081225114443.GD6115@zakalwe.fi>
Date:	Thu, 25 Dec 2008 13:44:43 +0200
From:	Heikki Orsila <shdl@...alwe.fi>
To:	Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com>
Cc:	git@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.6.1

On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 10:36:27PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * The packfile machinery hopefully is more robust when dealing with
>   corrupt packs if redundant objects involved in the corruption are
>   available elsewhere.

Has anyone written a summary of how Git's redundancy operates?

* What would be the probability for a single bit flip to corrupt the 
repository?

* And what is the situation where a single bit flip can not corrupt the 
database?

* When (which commands/functions) is error detection done?

Heikki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/