[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081226091521.GD27747@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 10:15:22 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Remove interrupt stack table usage from x86_64
kernel
* Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:
> The interrupt stack table (IST) mechanism is the only thing preventing
> kvm from deferring saving and reloading of some significant state. It
> is also somewhat complicated.
>
> Remove it by switching the special exceptions to use the normal irqstack.
>
> Avi Kivity (3):
> x86: drop the use of the tss interrupt stack table (IST)
> x86: Remove pda.irqcount
> x86: Switch critical exceptions and NMI to irqstack
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h | 12 -----
> arch/x86/include/asm/page_64.h | 7 ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/pda.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 11 ----
> arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets_64.c | 1 -
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 35 --------------
> arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c | 96 --------------------------------------
> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 49 ++++++++-----------
> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 12 ++--
> 9 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-)
looks good. Please base your work on the tip/master tree, we have a ton of
pending (and conflicting) changes in the lowlevel assembly area:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists