linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Compress kernel modules on installation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0812262134270.12031@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:09:31 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To:	Roland <devzero@....de>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Compress kernel modules on installation


On Friday 2008-12-26 21:23, Roland wrote:

> what about some "make modules_install_compressed" instead ?
>
> as i have run out of diskspace quite often when installing test kernels, i
> think we really need a feature like this.
>
> i`d also favour the makefile approach.
> why another kconfig option?
>
> jan`s patch looks clean and simple, but i think it`s a little bit intrusive...

Why so? module-ini

>
> regards
> roland
>
> ps:
> i`d use gzip without "-9" as this gives very little space savings. it mostly
> burns cpu and slows things down too much.
> ( see
> http://www.linuxjournal.com/files/linuxjournal.com/linuxjournal/articles/080/8051/8051f1.png

Here is one that is tailored for kernel modules:
http://tinyurl.com/8f2xta
Looks pretty much like the one from LJ but of course, .ko files
compress better than LJ :)
Oh well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/