[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49556896.8070307@tmr.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:28:22 -0500
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: Roland <devzero@....de>
CC: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Compress kernel modules on installation
Roland wrote:
>> On Friday 2008-12-26 21:23, Roland wrote:
>>
>>> what about some "make modules_install_compressed" instead ?
>>>
>>> as i have run out of diskspace quite often when installing test
>>> kernels, i
>>> think we really need a feature like this.
>>>
>>> i`d also favour the makefile approach.
>>> why another kconfig option?
>>>
>>> jan`s patch looks clean and simple, but i think it`s a little bit
>>> intrusive...
>>
>> Why so? module-ini
>
> with "intrusive" i meant, that all modules are now compressed by default
> and there is no switch to build them uncompressed.
> so you change a long established default which may not be welcomed by
> everyone and give no option for conservative people.
>
How many people use the option to install an uncompressed kernel?
> we should take care and not break things.
> default uncompressed, compressed implented as an option is a better
> strategy, imho.
> discuss changing the default at a later time then.
>
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists