[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081226150653.GD3156@hack.private>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:06:53 +0000
From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check return from argv_split() in do_coredump().
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 04:00:56PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>Hello.
>
>Am.$(D+1rico Wang wrote:
>> How about going to the line:
>>
>> current->fsuid = fsuid;
>>
>> ? Because when argv_split() fails, helper_argv is NULL and doesn't need
>> to be checked again.
>
>I didn't understand what you say. I'm saying that
>"do_coredump() may accesss helper_argv[0] when helper_argv == NULL",
>which will result in "NULL pointer dereference" problem.
>Yes, this problem unlikely happens. Thus,
>
>if (!helper_argv)
> goto fail_unlock;
>
>may be enough.
>
Yes, goto fail_unlock will go to this line:
if (helper_argv)
argv_free(helper_argv);
but in this situation, helper_argv is known as NULL, thus another
check doesn't need. So we can go to the line below, i.e.
fail_unlock:
if (helper_argv)
argv_free(helper_argv);
current->fsuid = fsuid; //<=== goto this line
coredump_finish(mm);
You need to add a new label, of course. :)
--
"Against stupidity, the gods themselves, contend in vain."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists