| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <49569AF1.8050205@zytor.com> Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 13:15:29 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> CC: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 byteorder.h: use __asm__/__inline__ for userspace Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 01:50:04AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> Use __asm__/__inline__ rather than asm/inline for all the functions >>> exported to userspace. >> I will imagine that we will see cleanup patches converting >> these back to inline/asm. >> How about doing this conversion as part of the headers_install.pl >> script so we know it is always correct? >> >> Then we can keep the familiar inline/asm in the kernel headers >> and always use the correct __asm__, __inline__ version for our >> exported headers. > > or name it __asm__exported__ to make sure it isnt cleaned up away. > Seems better to do it automatically. We end up with cleaner-looking code that way, too. It doesn't solve the need for symbols in inline functions in exported headers to have __ prefixes, though. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists