[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4956A142.6010207@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 23:42:26 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, jeremy@...p.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Remove interrupt stack table usage from x86_64 kernel
(v2)
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
>
>> They have the following commit IDs, and they are also in tip/master:
>>
>> 921e521: x86: move NMI back to interrupt stack
>> 36ef6c9: x86: make interrupt stack switching atomic
>> dd64891: x86: consolidate irq stack switching to a single macro
>> 955a368: x86: drop the use of the tss interrupt stack table (IST)
>>
>> I also started testing them in tip-qa.
>>
>
> testing failed quickly, the attached config crashes. I've pushed out the
> bad kernel to the tip/tmp.master.bad branch:
>
> fe3aac9: Merge branch 'x86/irq'
>
> (no crashlog available - all i know that the box crashed and rebooted,
> when booted with the bzImage built out of the attached config.)
>
I managed to reproduce this (after several hundred million interrupts
and several dozen million NMIs - do you run anything special on your tests?)
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists