[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4955B782.3030407@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:05:06 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, mingo@...e.hu
CC: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
mel@....ul.ie
Subject: [PATCH] perf_counter: more barrier in blank weak function
Impact: fix panic possible panic etc
some compiler seems to inline the weak global function if no line in it
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
diff --git a/kernel/perf_counter.c b/kernel/perf_counter.c
index d7a79f3..37f7716 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_counter.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_counter.c
@@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ hw_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter)
}
u64 __weak hw_perf_save_disable(void) { return 0; }
-void __weak hw_perf_restore(u64 ctrl) { }
-void __weak hw_perf_counter_setup(void) { }
+void __weak hw_perf_restore(u64 ctrl) { barrier(); }
+void __weak hw_perf_counter_setup(void) { barrier(); }
static void
list_add_counter(struct perf_counter *counter, struct perf_counter_context *ctx)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists