[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081228115621.GA11954@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:56:21 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: jeremy@...p.org, tony.luck@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, x86@...nel.org,
ian.campbell@...rix.com, beckyb@...nel.crashing.org,
joerg.roedel@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 9] swiotlb: use phys_addr_t for pages
* FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> You brought up a different topic, DMA bouncing implementations
> unification. DMA bouncing implementations unification is a very nice
> cleanup. But it's not related with Becky's patch to break IA64 build at
> all.
All i'm saying is that obviously neither Jeremy's nor Becky's patches were
created in a vacuum, and had it not been for the need and desire to extend
swiotlb we'd not have seen Becky's 9/9 cleanup patch either.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists