[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081228155608.GD28520@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 13:56:08 -0200
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24.7-rt25 and 2.6.26.8-rt12
Em Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 01:40:07PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 01:10:26PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 12:55:20AM -0500, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> > > We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24.7-rt25 and 2.6.26.8-rt12 trees,
> > > which can be downloaded from the location:
> > >
> > > http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/
> > >
> > > Information on the RT patch can be found at:
> > >
> > > http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page
> > >
> > > Changes since 2.6.26.6-rt11
> >
> > I managed to boot 2.6.26.8-rt12 once, but it oopsed when I started a
> > market data workload while generating load with a make -j 64 kernel
> > compile, couldn't get the proper backtrace because I was swamped with
> > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs related messages.
> >
> > When I tried to reboot to try again after setting
> > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs to zero I got the backtrace
> > below, will try again and report.
After disabling hung tasks reporting I get no oops but all tasks seem to
be hung :-\
Giving up for now, please advise on what other info you may need.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists