linux-kernel - Re: Should <linux/serial.h> define _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0812290435l12b0eb0ds11c1c56428cfc4a1@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Dec 2008 07:35:42 -0500
From:	"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To:	walt <w41ter@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: Should <linux/serial.h> define __u32?

On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 17:24, walt <w41ter@...il.com> wrote:
> So, my question is:  who should be responsible for defining
> that __u32, the author of serial.h or the author of the wine
> code that includes serial.h?

the kernel header should be doing #include <linux/serial.h>

if your distro doesnt patch their current headers to do this, then you
should open a bug report for them
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/