[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081229132305.GA31210@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:23:05 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Scott James Remnant <scott@...onical.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Notify init when processes are reparented to it
On 12/29, Scott James Remnant wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 14:01 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> > I'm highly skeptical that this is a desireable feature at all, and
> > certainly I find the abuse of siginfo_t.si_status here extremely
> > questionable. I think we need a clear explanation of what problems
> > the feature is intended to address.
> >
> Did the original e-mail not address this?
Do you mean
[RFC] Notify init when processes are reparented to it
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123038049428388
?
I am not sure I really understand the problem. And thus I can't
understand how this patch can help.
OK,
> We want to be able to supervise daemons.
What do you mean?
> Later on, 1002 will die and init will receive SIGCHLD for it.
>
> Unfortunately neither the 1001 or 1002 processes are known to init, even
> though they are original children of the process it spawned (1000), for
> init to be notified about them - this has been forgotten.
Ok, with this patch /sbin/init knows that 1002 is a descendant
of apache(1000) which was spwaned by init. What can init do
with this info?
To clarify, I am not arguing, I am just trying to understand.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists