[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12273.1230563075@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:04:35 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm>,
nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org, hch@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, steved@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, rwheeler@...hat.com,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Subject: Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> And that of course means that many many 2.6.28 patches which I am
> maintaining will need significant rework to apply on top of linux-next,
> and then they won't apply to mainline. Or that linux-next will not apply
> on top of those patches. Mainly memory management.
Significant rework to many many patches? The FS-Cache patches don't have all
that much impact outside of their own directories, AFS and NFS.
> Please drop the NFS tree until after -rc1.
>
> Guys, this: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/27/173
Okay, that's a reasonable request.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists