[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1230567322.26564.16.camel@jaswinder.satnam>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:45:22 +0530
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, joerg.roedel@....com,
leo.duran@....com, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: amd_iommu.c prealloc_protection_domains should be
static
Impact: cleanup, reduce kernel size a bit, avoid sparse warning
Fixes sparse warning:
arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c:1299:6: warning: symbol 'prealloc_protection_domains' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...il.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
index 2e2da71..658e29e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
@@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ static int amd_iommu_dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
* we don't need to preallocate the protection domains anymore.
* For now we have to.
*/
-void prealloc_protection_domains(void)
+static void prealloc_protection_domains(void)
{
struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
struct dma_ops_domain *dma_dom;
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists