[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ada4p0nve4r.fsf@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:44:52 -0800
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To: general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
Aleksey Senin <alekseys@...taire.com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
> ERROR: ".ipv6_chk_addr" [drivers/infiniband/core/ib_addr.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: ".ip6_route_output" [drivers/infiniband/core/ib_addr.ko] undefined!
>
> Caused by commit 38617c64bf9a10bf20e41d95b69bb81e8560fe9d ("RDMA/addr:
> Add support for translating IPv6 addresses"). This requires a dependency
> on IPV6.
So how do we want to fix this? (This question is mostly directed to the
IB guys) One possibility is to make all this depend on IPV6 in Kconfig,
but I think we want the RDMA CM to be buildable/usable even if IPv6
isn't enabled. A better option is to just put all the IPv6 related
stuff into
#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
and add a Kconfig dependency on (IPV6 || IPV6=n) as we did for IPoIB.
But then this leads to the behavior that loading the RDMA CM will cause
the ipv6 module to be loaded if IPV6=m in the kernel config, even if the
administrator doesn't want to enable IPv6, just as with IPoIB today.
And people already complain about that.
Anyone see a better solution (which we could use for IPoIB even)?
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists