[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081229201129.GA5386@localhost>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 22:11:29 +0200
From: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] kmemtrace: Use tracepoints instead of markers.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 03:43:56PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Eduard,
>
> On Mon, 2008-12-29 at 03:40 +0200, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> > diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> > index 1fcb32b..74d405d 100644
> > --- a/mm/slab.c
> > +++ b/mm/slab.c
> > @@ -3624,8 +3624,9 @@ void *kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags)
> > {
> > void *ret = __cache_alloc(cachep, flags, __builtin_return_address(0));
> >
> > - kmemtrace_mark_alloc(KMEMTRACE_TYPE_CACHE, _RET_IP_, ret,
> > - obj_size(cachep), cachep->buffer_size, flags);
> > + trace_kmemtrace_alloc(KMEMTRACE_TYPE_CACHE, _RET_IP_, ret,
> > + obj_size(cachep), cachep->buffer_size,
> > + flags, -1);
>
> One minor nit: I'd prefer we call these trace_kmem_cache_alloc(),
> trace_kmalloc(), and so on. The trace_kmemtrace prefix doesn't really
> make much sense to me.
Sure, I'll also move the KMEMTRACE_TYPE_* enum to mm/kmemtrace.c.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists