[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <495937C3.7090101@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:49:07 -0800
From: John Daiker <daikerjohn@...il.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
CC: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] drivers/usb/gadget: use USB API functions rather
than constants
On 12/29/2008 12:22 PM, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 29 December 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, David Brownell wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Those functions were supposed to go into<linux/usb/ch9.h>, as
>>> I recall, since they weren't specific to the host side stack.
>>>
>>> Having them added to the wrong file is surely part of why
>>> they've only been used by host side drivers. :)
>>>
>> Would you like to write a patch moving the functions to ch9.h? Or
>> would you like to ask Julia or me to do it?
>>
>
> Someone other than me. ;)
>
> Maybe someone on K-J will want to volunteer with a patch
> before either you or Julia...
>
> - Dave
>
So you're saying that these functions:
usb_endpoint_dir_in(epd)
usb_endpoint_dir_out(epd)
usb_endpoint_is_bulk_in(epd)
usb_endpoint_is_bulk_out(epd)
usb_endpoint_is_int_in(epd)
usb_endpoint_is_int_out(epd)
usb_endpoint_num(epd)
usb_endpoint_type(epd)
usb_endpoint_xfer_bulk(epd)
usb_endpoint_xfer_control(epd)
usb_endpoint_xfer_int(epd)
usb_endpoint_xfer_isoc(epd)
Should be defined in ch9.h instead of usb.h?
If that's the case, then I'll be glad to cook up a patch! :)
~John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists