linux-kernel - Re: [dm-devel] Re: jbd2 inside a device mapper module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081229210537.GN4127@blitiri.com.ar>
Date:	Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:05:37 -0200
From:	Alberto Bertogli <albertito@...tiri.com.ar>
To:	Shyam_Iyer@...l.com
Cc:	dm-devel@...hat.com, Alex.Zhuravlev@....com,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....EDU,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Re: jbd2 inside a device mapper module

On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:50:14AM +0530, Shyam_Iyer@...l.com wrote:
> Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > On Dec 25, 2008  12:35 -0200, Alberto Bertogli wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 06:49:15PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > > > I have no idea why you would need to do manual __breads().  No
> doubt
> > > > I'm missing some context here.  
> > >
> > > I'm writing (just for fun and learning purposes) a device mapper
> > > module that stores checksums on writes and verifies them on reads.
> The
> > > integrity metadata (currently just the checksum) is interleaved in
> the
> > > backing device: one sector holding the integrity metadata for the
> > > following 64 data sectors.
> 
> > Alex and I discussed implementing checksums for ext4 using an external
> device like this, and he might have some more design information for
> you.
> 
> 
> That external device could possibly be a TPM chip that can store
> checksums.

Thanks for the suggestion. The code I have at the moment (without the
journal stuff) already has the capability of storing checksums in a
different device. It's one of the reasons why I would prefer to avoid
using jbd.

I think I'll go with the "two metadatas" approach and see how it goes.
Worst case scenario is that I have to drop that code, which means to be
back where I am now, only with one less option.

Thanks,
		Alberto

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/