[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adad4fatzz1.fsf@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:48:18 -0800
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"general\@lists.openfabrics.org" <general@...ts.openfabrics.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
> > I'd suggest
> >
> > config IF_IPV6
> > bool
> > depends on INET
> > depends on !(INFINIBAND = y && IPV6 = m)
> > default y
>
> Makes sense, will do. How about calling it INFINIBAND_USE_IPV6 or
> something like that, though? (Since it's under the INFINIBAND config
> stuff and exists to forbid INFINIBAND=y && IPV6=m trying to use IPv6).
Actually, thinking about this for 30 more seconds, I'm not sure how
another config symbol helps at all. I do like splitting dependencies
onto multiple lines as a replacement for &&, so I have:
config INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS
bool
depends on INET
depends on !(INFINIBAND = y && IPV6 = m)
default y
right now.
Not sure if it's worth introducing another Kconfig symbol that depends
on IPV6 != n to avoid the
#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
tests. I note that there are tons of that construction all over the
tree, and the places without it look somewhat dubious (eg
net/ipv4/ip_gre.c looks as if it will do the wrong thing if IPV6=m).
Maybe adding CONFIG_IPV6_ENABLED or something and cleaning up the whole
tree would be a good janitorial project?
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists