[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1230540199.3715.11.camel@jaswinder.satnam>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:13:18 +0530
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: reboot.c declare port_cf9_safe before they get
used
Hello Ingo,
On Sat, 2008-12-27 at 11:31 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> btw., this is ugly now:
>
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> > #endif
> >
> > #include <mach_ipi.h>
> > +#include "../pci/pci.h"
>
> could you send another patch that moves arch/x86/pci/pci.h to
> arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h (and update all the pci.h include sites)?
>
1. I send [PATCH] move arch/x86/pci/pci.h to
arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h but I forget to write x86: before this
patch.
Please let me know which one is better option :
[PATCH]x86: move arch/x86/pci/pci.h to arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h
OR
[PATCH -tip]x86: move arch/x86/pci/pci.h to
arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h
OR some other name.
2. I also did not write any reason of patch this may lead confusion to
other developers, can you please provide some good reasons for this
patch.
3. I also did some cleanups in arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h raised
by ./scripts/checkpatch.pl, is this OK.
4. Can I resend above patch by solving above issues.
Thank you,
JSR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists