linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.28: How come some kernel options cannot be disabled for non-existent hardware?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081230133737.3a44513e@sauron.linicks.net>
Date:	Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:37:37 +0000
From:	Nick Warne <nick@...sn.org>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.28: How come some kernel options cannot be disabled for
 non-existent hardware?

> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 07:25:42AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> 
> > It still shows up as enabled and it is in dmesg shown above.  How come 
> > some kernel options are enabled and cannot (easily?) be disabled for 
> > hardware that does not exist in my machine?
> 
> It's enabled by the ATA_ACPI support so libata can handle ACPI-based 
> drive hotswaps. You can check these by looking at the help for an option 
> in make menuconfig. That'll tell you what's selecting an option.

I have been battling this sort of thing lately.  In fact, the dock
option seems to get set with '& experimental'.  I got rid of it, but
that then buggered up the selection of k8temp which needs experimental.

Nick
-- 
Free Software Foundation Associate Member 5508
http://linicks.net/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/