[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <495A4CC0.6000000@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:30:56 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@....spb.ru>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kirr@...dau.phys.spbu.ru, Dmitry Gryazin <gdu@....spb.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ide: motherboard-info based blacklist for ide-dma
Hello.
Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> From: Dmitry Gryazin <gdu@....spb.ru>
> We need to keep our kernel working on both legacy and modern hardware.
> As it turned out, some boards don't have proper IDE DMA support for
> CompactFlash (CF) adaptors, because pin connectors which relate to DMA are left
> unsoldered (*).
> To verify this we even bought external IDE CF adaptor which showed the same
> symthoms, and then manually soldered pins that were left dangling, and voila,
> DMA started to work!
> Again, as they say, lots of manufacturers of not-so-new hardware did CF
> soldering by the wrong way with respect to DMA, so we need a workaround.
> For this __ide_dma_bad_drive function is enhance to check not only drives
> blacklist but motherboards blacklist too.
> Please apply before 2.6.29
> (*) On IEI PCISA-C3/EDEN the kernel boots _very_ slowly, becuase we have lots
> of DMA timer expiry:
> <~30s pause>
> hdc: dma_timer_epiry: dma_status == 0x21
> hdc: DMA timeout error
> ...
> hdc: DMA disabled
> ide1: dma reset
>
> <and the whole story repeats:>
> <~30s pause>
> hdc: dma_timer_epiry: dma_status == 0x21
> ...
Are you aware of ide_core.nodma= option which allows disabling DMA per
interface/drive? Read Documentation/ide/ide.txt please. I should note that
nodma option has been there for ages in one or other form.
> Also see this posts from 2006 where they say this is usually a problem with CF
> adapter not fully soldered:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/23/198
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/6/20/164
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Gryazin <gdu@....spb.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@....spb.ru>
NAK.
> diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c b/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c
> index fffd117..adb5d9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,21 @@
> #include <linux/ide.h>
> #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +#include <linux/dmi.h>
> +
> +/* Internal structure for blacklisted boards */
> +struct board_blacklist_entry {
> + const char *board_vendor;
> + const char *board_name;
> + const char *drive_name;
> +};
> +
> +/* Blacklisted boards which have problems with DMA */
> +static const struct board_blacklist_entry board_blacklist[] = {
> + /* on IEI PCISA-C3 CF adapter pin connectors for DMA are missing */
> + { "FIC" , "PT-2200" , "hdc" },
> + { NULL , NULL , NULL }
> +};
>
> static const struct drive_list_entry drive_whitelist[] = {
> { "Micropolis 2112A" , NULL },
> @@ -207,6 +222,30 @@ void ide_dma_on(ide_drive_t *drive)
> drive->hwif->dma_ops->dma_host_set(drive, 1);
> }
>
> +static int __ide_dma_bad_adaptor(ide_drive_t *drive)
> +{
> + const struct board_blacklist_entry *table = board_blacklist;
> +
> + const char *board_vendor = dmi_get_system_info(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR);
> + const char *board_name = dmi_get_system_info(DMI_BOARD_NAME);
> +
> + if (!board_vendor || !board_name)
> + return 0;
> +
> + for ( ; table->board_name ; table++)
> + if ((!strcmp(board_vendor, table->board_vendor)) &&
> + (!strcmp(board_name, table->board_name)) &&
> + (!strcmp(drive->name, table->drive_name))) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Disabling (U)DMA for %s "
> + "(Board %s %s is blacklisted)\n", drive->name,
> + (char *)&drive->id[ATA_ID_PROD], board_vendor,
> + board_name);
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
This code doesn't anyhow discriminate the case of on-board CF and say
normal IDE PCI card plugged into such board -- with latter having no issues
with DMA whatsoever. E.g. AMD Geode GX2 dev. board (DB2301) has CF slot (with
unsoldered DMA pins, IIRC) and 3 PCI slots where you can plug a normal IDE card.
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists