[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <495A5A9F.9020406@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:30:07 -0600
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.27.10: ata1.00: HPA detected: current 293044655, native
293046768
Justin Piszcz wrote:
> On one system, two Raptor 150s:
>
> [ 0.739402] ata1.00: HPA detected: current 293044655, native 293046768
> [ 0.739491] ata1.00: ATA-7: WDC WD1500ADFD-00NLR5, 21.07QR5, max
> UDMA/133
> [ 0.739577] ata1.00: 293044655 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
> [ 0.742454] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
>
> [ 1.059146] ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> [ 1.061406] ata2.00: ATA-7: WDC WD1500ADFD-00NLR5, 21.07QR5, max
> UDMA/133
> [ 1.061494] ata2.00: 293046768 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
> [ 1.064360] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
>
> Two disks in a RAID-1 (mdadm) configuration, how come the first one
> has an issue w/HPA as the firmware of both disks is the same..?
>
> l1:~# smartctl -a /dev/sda | grep -i bytes
> User Capacity: 150,038,863,360 bytes
> l1:~# smartctl -a /dev/sdb | grep -i bytes
> User Capacity: 150,039,945,216 bytes
> l1:~#
>
> Why does this occur?
Presumably somebody or something set up a host protected area on one
drive and not the other.. I believe there are some utilities out there
that can be used to disable the HPA and allow the full capacity to be used.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists