[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <495A65EF.5050406@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:18:23 +0100
From: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
To: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...radead.org>
CC: linux-parisc <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
Randolph Chung <randolph@...sq.org>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
John David Anglin <dave@...uly1.hia.nrc.ca>,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] module.c: fix module loading failure of large modules
(take 2)
Kyle McMartin wrote:
> Ugh, I fail at typing, resending for rusty's benefit.
>
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 01:07:24PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
>> [Adding rusty to CC]
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 09:43:12PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
>>> +unsigned long module_additional_section_size(struct module *mod,
>>> + unsigned int section);
>>> +
>> I think this would be more palatable as
>>
>> #ifdef HAVE_MODULE_SECTION_STUBS
>> unsigned long module_additional_section_size(struct module *mod,
>> unsigned int section);
>> #else
>> static inline unsigned long module_additional_section_size(struct module *mod,
>> unsigned int section)
>> {
>> return 0;
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> and removing the conditional in kernel/module.c, possibly the symbol
>> should be "arch_module_a..." just to make it clear to anyone reading.
>>
>> Anyway, it's up to rusty.
>>
>> Rusty, we'd like to get this patch in, so I can merge the dependent
>> parisc-specific patch.
Rusty, I think I've a cleaner patch for that and will send it soon...
Helge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists