linux-kernel - Re: [1/9] pohmelfs: documentation.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:23:33 +0300
From:	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To:	Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@...il.com>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, Evgeniy Polyakov <zbe@...emap.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pohmelfs@...emap.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [1/9] pohmelfs: documentation.

Hi Paolo.

On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 11:19:29PM +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi (paolo.ciarrocchi@...il.com) wrote:
> Performance seems to be the most important argument in favour of pohmelfs.
> You should probably add more performance data in the cover letter of
> the patch serie. All the information are already available but not
> easy to be reached.
> In short, try to do a better work in "selling" your product :-)

I will create easily understandible graphs and put a link to them into
the description. Performance is indeed one of the interesting parts
among POHMELFS features.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/