linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] futex: correct futex_requeue futex key ref counting in requeue loop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <495AB065.3080707@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:36:05 -0800
From:	Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@....ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] futex: correct futex_requeue futex key ref counting
 in requeue loop

Darren Hart wrote:
> The requeue loop takes multiple references to key2, but the corresponding
> put loop decrements the refs for key1.  This patch corrects the accounting.
> 
> Build and boot tested on an x86_64 system.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@....ibm.com>
> ---
> 
>  kernel/futex.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index cf363ce..3b66d91 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ out_unlock:
> 
>  	/* drop_futex_key_refs() must be called outside the spinlocks. */
>  	while (--drop_count >= 0)
> -		drop_futex_key_refs(&key1);
> +		drop_futex_key_refs(&key2);
> 
>  	put_futex_key(fshared, &key2);
>  out_put_key1:
> 

Ugh, so I'm having second thoughts about this patch.  I believe what is 
happening here is that the requeue loop requeues each waiter from one 
futex (key1) to another (key2).  It rightly takes a reference to the 
futex at key2 and then decrements the references to key1 by drop_count 
(since the waiters now reference key2, not key1).  The newly taken key2 
references will be dropped in futex_wait() when each waiter is woken up 
and takes the futex.

I apologize for the confusion on this.  Thanks for suggesting I send 
this patch out independently from the rest Peter ;-)

If we can come to a consensus on this, I suggest pulling this patch from 
tip/core/futexes.


-- 
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/