[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081229195358.6a239657.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:53:58 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
jejb <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:16:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20081219:
>
> Undropped tree:
> scci
> mtd
>
> Dropped trees (temporarily):
> nfs (akpm request due to 2.6.30 features)
> kvm (build problem)
> rr (build poblem)
> semaphore-removal (due to unfixed conflicts against Linus' tree)
> cpu_alloc (build problem)
> audit (difficult conflicts)
>
> Linus' tree had three build failures requiring patches and one requiring
> a revert.
>From drivers/scsi/Kconfig:
config LIBFC
tristate "LibFC module"
depends on SCSI && SCSI_FC_ATTRS
---help---
Fibre Channel library module
config FCOE
tristate "FCoE module"
depends on SCSI
select LIBFC
---help---
Fibre Channel over Ethernet module
Aside from being very skimpy help messages, nothing there requires
SCSI_FC_ATTRS to be enabled for FCOE, so when FCOE is enabled,
LIBFC is selected, and then bang:
ERROR: "scsi_is_fc_rport" [drivers/scsi/libfc/libfc.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "fc_remote_port_delete" [drivers/scsi/libfc/libfc.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "fc_remote_port_add" [drivers/scsi/libfc/libfc.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "fc_release_transport" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "fc_remove_host" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "fc_attach_transport" [drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.ko] undefined!
config attached.
---
~Randy
Download attachment "config-r7613" of type "application/octet-stream" (67117 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists