[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081230054257.GC11037@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 06:42:57 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@....ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: add WARN_ON to catch certain assymetric
(get|put)_futex_key calls
* Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com> wrote:
> Following up on my previous key reference accounting patches, this patch
> will catch puts on keys that haven't been "got". This won't catch nested
> get/put mismatches though.
>
> Build and boot tested, with minimal desktop activity and a run of the
> open_posix_testsuite in LTP for testing. No warnings logged.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
> Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: "Rusty Russell" <rusty@....ibm.com>
> ---
>
> kernel/futex.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
applied to tip/core/futexes, thanks!
I changed this:
> + WARN_ON(1);
> return;
to WARN_ON_ONCE() - warning once per bootup is good enough for
kerneloops.org to pick it up, while a ton of warnings add no extra (other
than to inconvenience the user, or even make the system unworkable).
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists