linux-kernel - Re: [patch] locking, percpu counters: introduce separate lock classes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081230060536.GG11037@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:05:36 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	"Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>,
	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
	"Duyck, Alexander H" <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] locking, percpu counters: introduce separate lock
	classes


* Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 03:14:17PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > my testing efforts today are not particularly dominated by luck :-)
> > 
> > Below is the latest splat that i got with Peter's patch plus the revert of 
> > dd24c00191 applied.
> 
> > [   78.679386] 
> > [   78.679389] =================================
> > [   78.680039] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
> > [   78.680039] 2.6.28-tip-03885-g44c31d5-dirty #13188
> > [   78.680039] ---------------------------------
> > [   78.680039] inconsistent {softirq-on-W} -> {in-softirq-W} usage.
> > [   78.680039] ssh/4054 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
> > [   78.680039]  (key#8){-+..}, at: [<c042710e>] __percpu_counter_add+0x52/0x7a
> > [   78.680039] {softirq-on-W} state was registered at:
> > [   78.680039]   [<c0163e6e>] __lock_acquire+0x288/0xa93
> > [   78.680039]   [<c01646d6>] lock_acquire+0x5d/0x7a
> > [   78.680039]   [<c0ae0473>] _spin_lock+0x20/0x2f
> > [   78.680039]   [<c042710e>] __percpu_counter_add+0x52/0x7a
> > [   78.680039]   [<c09c3e2f>] percpu_counter_add+0xf/0x12
> > [   78.680039]   [<c09c50ef>] tcp_v4_init_sock+0xe5/0xea
> 
> Right, this is the correct version of the earlier splat :)
> 
> Anyway, I've extended Peter's patch to cover the other cases.
> Please let me know if it still bitches with this + Peter's fbc
> patch.
> 
> net: Fix percpu counters deadlock
> 
> When we converted the protocol atomic counters such as the orphan
> count and the total socket count deadlocks were introduced due to
> the mismatch in BH status of the spots that used the percpu counter
> operations.
> 
> Based on the diagnosis and patch by Peter Zijlstra, this patch
> fixes these issues by disabling BH where we may be in process
> context.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>

thanks, will start testing it now.

One small nit: could you please add the Reported-by line for Jeff Kirscher 
who reported the problem originally:

 Reported-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/