[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200901010002.41477.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 00:02:40 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Cc: "linux-parisc" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
Randolph Chung <randolph@...sq.org>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
John David Anglin <dave@...uly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] parisc: fix module loading failure of large kernel modules (take 4)
On Wednesday 31 December 2008 22:01:18 Helge Deller wrote:
> +/* Additional bytes needed by arch in front of individual sections */
> +unsigned int arch_module_section_size(struct module *mod,
> + unsigned int section);
> +
...
> +/* Additional bytes needed by arch in front of individual sections */
> +unsigned int __attribute__ ((weak)) arch_module_section_size(
> + struct module *mod, unsigned int section)
> +{
> + /* default implementation just returns zero */
> + return 0;
> +}
Not quite what I had in mind... let me show you:
/* Bytes needed for a section: default is just the section size. */
unsigned int __attribute__((weak))
arch_module_section_size(struct module *mod, Elf_Shdr *sechdrs, unsigned int sec)
{
return sechdrs[sec].sh_size;
}
Otherwise I'd have called it "arch_module_extra_size()".
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists