[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1230735246.3470.107.camel@hermosa.site>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 07:54:06 -0700
From: "Peter W. Morreale" <pmorreale@...ell.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add /proc controls for pdflush threads
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 00:01 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:12:33 -0700 Peter W Morreale <pmorreale@...ell.com> wrote:
>
> > From: \"Peter W. Morreale\" <pmorreale@...ell.com>
> >
> > This patch adds /proc entries to give the admin the ability to
> > control the minimum and maximum number of pdflush threads. This allows
> > finer control of pdflush on both large and small machines.
> >
> > The patch adds '/proc/sys/vm/nr_pdflush_threads_min' and
> > '/proc/sys/vm/nr_pdflush_threads_max' with r/w permissions.
>
> Why is this needed? Where's the benefit? What observations led you to
> develop this patch? etc.
I assume you are caught up on this thread Andrew? (A later post
outlined the rational)
>
> > --- a/include/linux/sysctl.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sysctl.h
> > @@ -205,6 +205,8 @@ enum
> > VM_PANIC_ON_OOM=33, /* panic at out-of-memory */
> > VM_VDSO_ENABLED=34, /* map VDSO into new processes? */
> > VM_MIN_SLAB=35, /* Percent pages ignored by zone reclaim */
> > + VM_NR_PDFLUSH_THREADS_MAX=36, /* nr_pdflush_threads_max */
> > + VM_NR_PDFLUSH_THREADS_MIN=37, /* nr_pdflush_threads_min */
> > };
>
> We don't do this any more...
>
nod.
> > .proc_handler = &proc_dointvec,
> > },
> > {
> > + .ctl_name = VM_NR_PDFLUSH_THREADS_MIN,
>
> please just use CTL_UNNUMBERED here.
>
nod. Thanks,
-PWM
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists