[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <495B90E6.9010407@panasas.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:33:58 +0200
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: avishay@...il.com, jeff@...zik.org, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, osd-dev@...n-osd.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] exofs: dir_inode and directory operations
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:28:57 +0200
> Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com> wrote:
>
>> implementation of directory and inode operations.
>>
>> * A directory is treated as a file, and essentially contains a list
>> of <file name, inode #> pairs for files that are found in that
>> directory. The object IDs correspond to the files' inode numbers
>> and are allocated using a 64bit incrementing global counter.
>> * Each file's control block (AKA on-disk inode) is stored in its
>> object's attributes. This applies to both regular files and other
>> types (directories, device files, symlinks, etc.).
>>
>> ...
>>
>> fs/exofs/dir.c | 649 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> yes, this does look rather ext2-like ;)
>
> How long ago was the code cloned from ext2? iirc there have been a
> number of fairly subtle bugs fixed in ext2/dir.c over the past year or
> three. If the code was not quite recently cloned then I'd suggest that
> you spend a bit of time looking through the ext2 changelogs, see if
> there are any bugfixes which needs to be ported.
>
>
Long! Like Linux-v2.6.10 ;)
I will git-log the files in question and see if any of the bugs
are relevant here. (They should be).
Thanks that is most valuable input.
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists