[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081231112645.b1867977.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:26:45 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Cc: avishay@...il.com, jeff@...zik.org, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, osd-dev@...n-osd.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] exofs: osd Swiss army knife
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:33:41 +0200 Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> +int prepare_get_attr_list_add_entry(struct osd_request *req,
> >> + uint32_t page_num,
> >> + uint32_t attr_num,
> >> + uint32_t attr_len)
> >> +{
> >> + struct osd_attr attr = {
> >> + .page = page_num,
> >
> > Kernel developers expect a field called "page" to have type `struct
> > page *'. osd_attr.page is thus designed to confuse.
> >
> >> ...
> >>
> >
>
> Rant below (can be ignored):
> This single fix will cause a massive change to the open-osd
> initiator patchset, (18 patches), and resubmission .I made the mistake
> because this name originates from a file that all naming conventions
> are taken from the OSD standard text. However this is no excuse
> for using a well known Kernel construct name. I will fix it. And
> will be more careful in the future.
The world wouldn't end if you left the code as-is. We've done worse things :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists