[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84ee33570812311400m5492af64n45c645a13fe91c2c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:00:19 -0500
From: "Matt Cross" <matt.cross@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: ebtables match inverted in 2.6.28?
I think the work to move ebtables to use xtables broke ebtables.
Specifically, in commit 8cc784eec6676b58e7f60419c88179aaa97bf71c the
return value of the match functions was inverted so that they return 1
(true) on matches instead of EBT_MATCH (0), and vice versa (look in
ebt_ip.c). The logic in ebtables.c (ebt_do_table() and
EBT_MATCH_ITERATE()) expect match functions to return 0 for matches.
The patch at the end of this message fixes the problem, but seems a
little hacky to me. Who's the right person to address this?
-Matt
--- linux-2.6.28.orig/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c 2008-12-24
18:26:37.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.28/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c 2008-12-31
16:17:44.000000000 -0500
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
{
par->match = m->u.match;
par->matchinfo = m->data;
- return m->u.match->match(skb, par);
+ return !m->u.match->match(skb, par);
}
static inline int ebt_dev_check(char *entry, const struct net_device *device)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists