[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0901021644240.4322@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 17:07:52 +0100 (CET)
From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Tom Spink <tspink@...il.com>, Ingo Brueckl <ib@...peronline.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: compile time warnings
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Tom Spink wrote:
> >
> > > 2009/1/1 Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>:
> > > > On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, Ingo Brueckl wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > pgd_base is very much used...
> > >
> > > It's probably something to do with:
> > >
> > > # define permanent_kmaps_init(pgd_base) do { } while (0)
> > >
> > > Which is within the #else part of #if CONFIG_HIGHMEM. So, if
> > > CONFIG_HIGHMEM is not set, permanent_kmaps_init gets wiped out, and
> > > therefore that warning will be issued.
> > >
> > > Perhaps changing that to an empty inline would remove the warning?
> > >
> > Yeah, I noticed that as well after sending the mail.
> > Another way to silence the warning (which I think is nicer) would be
> > something like this;
> >
> >
> > Silence 'unused variable' warning in arch/x86/mm/init_32.c::pagetable_init
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
> > ---
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> > index 8655b5b..0affa8e 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> > @@ -511,9 +511,7 @@ static void __init early_ioremap_page_table_range_init(pgd_t *pgd_base)
> >
> > static void __init pagetable_init(void)
> > {
> > - pgd_t *pgd_base = swapper_pg_dir;
> > -
> > - permanent_kmaps_init(pgd_base);
> > + permanent_kmaps_init((pgd_t *)swapper_pg_dir);
> > }
>
> no, this only works around the warning by 'silencing' it (it also includes
> an ugly type cast) - instead of fixing the core problem.
>
Hmm, true..
> The core problem is that permanent_kmaps_init() is a CPP macro in the
> !HIGHMEM case - so the right fix would be to convert that to a proper C
> inline function. (same for set_highmem_pages_init() while at it)
>
> Would you mind to send a patch for that that we could push to Linus?
>
Sure, I'll do that.
> <soapbox>
>
> The highest quality fixes that are motivated by compiler warnings are the
> ones that do not actually 'fix a warning', but instead improve/reshape
> some code so that as a side-effect the warning goes away.
>
> If you ever see a patch that 'silences a warning', it usually shows that
> the deeper problem has not been fully understood. (Except of course if the
> warning shows a genuine bug in the code - but in that case we fix the bug
> and not the warning - the warning was just the canary to it.)
>
> </soapbox>
>
Well said.
> Ingo
>
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists