[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090102162357.GH1180@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 17:23:57 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@...il.com>,
Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@...il.com>,
Ingo Brueckl <ib@...peronline.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: x86 (Linux Tiny): configure out support for some processors
* Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 21:43:03 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput said:
>
> > Let me know why should I choose EMBEDDED option ? I know I am not
> > using Embbeded machine and I do not need embbeded features on my
> > machine. If I am willing to go North why should I go South first ?
>
> EMBEDDED is a bad name for the option. It *started* as "only those
> maniac who need to trim their kernel WAY down should select this", and
> ended up as "stuff that 95% of users shouldn't change, but you can if
> you know what you're doing".
i think both activities fit the generic 'embedded/specialized kernel' term
quite well, so i dont think there's a big naming problem. There's maybe a
documentation problem - the help text could be improved some more to
signal that certain specialized config options are only available under
CONFIG_EMBEDDED.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists