[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090103.013755.42849152.ryusuke@osrg.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 01:37:55 +0900 (JST)
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Btrfs for mainline
Hi,
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:19:09 -0500, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> This has only btrfs as a module and would be the fastest way to see
> the .c files. btrfs doesn't have any changes outside of fs/Makefile and
> fs/Kconfig
I found some overlapping (or cloned) functions in
btrfs-unstable.git/fs/btrfs, for example:
- Declarations to apply hardware crc32c in fs/btrfs/crc32c.h:
The same code is found in arch/x86/crypto/crc32c-intel.c
- btrfs_wait_on_page_writeback_range() and btrfs_fdatawrite_range():
These are clones of wait_on_page_writeback_range() and
__filemap_fdatawrite_range() respectively, and can be removed if they
are just exported.
- Copies of add_to_page_cache_lru() found in compression.c and extent_io.c
(can be replaced if it's exported)
How about including patches to resolve these in the btrfs kernel tree
(or patchset to be posted) ?
In addition, there seem to be well-separated reusable routines such as
async-thread (enhanced workqueue) and extent_map. Do you intend to
move these into lib/ or so?
I also tried scripts/checkpatch.pl against btrfs, and it has detected
45 ERRORs and 93 WARNINGs. I think it's a good opportunity to clean
up these violations.
With regards,
Ryusuke Konishi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists