[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901020933370.5086@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:38:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rdreier@...co.com, ian.campbell@...rix.com,
jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com, deller@....de,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kyle@...artin.ca, randolph@...sq.org,
sam@...nborg.org, dave@...uly1.hia.nrc.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Disallow GCC 4.1.0 / 4.1.1
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> I think this is wrong.
>
> Just move the check into <linux/compiler-gcc4.h>
In fact, looking at that whole mess, I redid it all. It was disgusting how
conditionals in gcc4.h needed to double-check that __GNUC__ really was 4
(rather than something bigger), which largely negated the whole nice clean
compiler version separation.
I pushed out my preferred version, which fixes up the whole thing. The
gcc4 header file now only gets included for __GNUC__ == 4, and when we
ever see a __GNUC__ of 5, it will automatically DTRT and try to include
<linux/compiler-gcc5.h> instead of #4.
And then the check in gcc4.h for 4.1.0 and 4.1.1 is much simplified. The
two patches I pushed out add functionality, but don't actually add any new
lines (the first simplification patch removes more lines than it adds, and
the second one that adds the __weak bug test adds as mahy lines as the
cleanup removed).
And it all looks more logical too, imho.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists