linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] CRED: Fix regression in cap_capable() as shown up by sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2352.1230923882@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 02 Jan 2009 19:18:02 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	jmorris@...ei.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CRED: Fix regression in cap_capable() as shown up by sys_faccessat() [ver #2]

J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:

> > Fix a regression in cap_capable() due to:
> > 
> > 	commit 5ff7711e635b32f0a1e558227d030c7e45b4a465
> 
> By the way, this should be 3b11a1decef07c19443d24ae926982bc8ec9f4c0,
> which is the patch that was committed by James Morris and is in Linus's
> tree.  I assume 5ff7711... is the commitid in your tree and that James
> applied it as a patch instead of pulling from you.

Erm...  Yes.  I'm not sure how my test tree has managed to come up with that
ID.  The 3b11 one is indeed correct.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/