[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <495E6BEE.1000805@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 11:33:02 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
CC: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Embedded Linux mailing list <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3]: Replace kernel/timeconst.pl with kernel/timeconst.sh
Rob Landley wrote:
>
> You mean "The new shell script is much simpler, about 1/4 the size, runs on
> Red Hat 9 from 2003, and isn't perl?" :)
>
And introduces unclear environment dependencies depending on how
external utilities are implemented.
The whole point of why that script was written in Perl was to have
access to arbitrary-precision arithmetic -- after it was shown that bc
would simply lock up on some systems.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists