linux-kernel - Re: [patch] Re: problem with "sched: revert back to per-rq vruntime"?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <495E7B5F.9080609@jaysonking.com>
Date:	Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:38:55 -0600
From:	Jayson King <dev@...sonking.com>
To:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [patch] Re: problem with "sched: revert back to per-rq	vruntime"?

Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 18:14 -0600, Jayson King wrote:
>
>   
>> Still works OK for me. You may add, if you like:
>>
>> Tested-By: Jayson King <dev@...sonking.com>
>>     
>
> Actually, I prefer the below.  Everything in one spot and obvious.
>
> Impact: bug fixlet.
>
> Fix sched_slice() to emit a sane result whether a task is currently enqueued or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
>
>  kernel/sched_fair.c |   30 ++++++++++++------------------
>  1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> index 5ad4440..1a35bad 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -386,20 +386,6 @@ int sched_nr_latency_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>  #endif
>  
>  /*
> - * delta *= P[w / rw]
> - */
> -static inline unsigned long
> -calc_delta_weight(unsigned long delta, struct sched_entity *se)
> -{
> -	for_each_sched_entity(se) {
> -		delta = calc_delta_mine(delta,
> -				se->load.weight, &cfs_rq_of(se)->load);
> -	}
> -
> -	return delta;
> -}
> -
> -/*
>   * delta /= w
>   */
>  static inline unsigned long
> @@ -440,12 +426,20 @@ static u64 __sched_period(unsigned long nr_running)
>   */
>  static u64 sched_slice(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
>  {
> -	unsigned long nr_running = cfs_rq->nr_running;
> +	u64 slice = __sched_period(cfs_rq->nr_running + !se->on_rq);
> +	
> +	for_each_sched_entity(se) {
> +		struct load_weight *load = &cfs_rq->load;
>  
> -	if (unlikely(!se->on_rq))
> -		nr_running++;
> +		if (unlikely(!se->on_rq)) {
> +			struct load_weight lw = cfs_rq->load;
>  
> -	return calc_delta_weight(__sched_period(nr_running), se);
> +			update_load_add(&lw, se->load.weight);
> +			load = &lw;
> +		}
> +		slice = calc_delta_mine(slice, se->load.weight, load);
> +	}
> +	return slice;
>  }
>  
>  /*
>   


Still good. Thanks.

Jayson

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/