[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901021616590.3590@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:30:36 -0500 (EST)
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] ACPI: create kernel/acpi/
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/acpi/Makefile b/kernel/acpi/Makefile
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..92a1f94
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/kernel/acpi/Makefile
> > @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> > +#
> > +# Makefile for the Linux/ACPI
> > +#
> > +
> > +export ACPI_CFLAGS
> > +
>
> Why is ACPI_CFLAGS exported?
Dunno what export actually does -- drivers/acpi/Makefile
has been this way for many years.
I believe that -Os is the right way to build the ACPI code.
I see that src/Makefile now has
ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Os
else
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O2
endif
so maybe we are now being redundant?
> > +ACPI_CFLAGS := -Os
> > +
> > +ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG
> > + ACPI_CFLAGS += -DACPI_DEBUG_OUTPUT
> > +endif
> > +
> > +EXTRA_CFLAGS += $(ACPI_CFLAGS)
> A better way:
>
> ccflags-$(CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG) := -DACPI_DEBUG_OUTPUT
>
> Note: EXTRA_CFLAGS is deprecated in favour of ccflags-y.
can do.
thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists