[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090102215208.GA8494@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 22:52:08 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [incremental-PATCH-for-Sam's-Review] ACPI: use ccflags-y instead of EXTRA_CFLAGS
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 04:44:02PM -0500, Len Brown wrote:
> From: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/Makefile | 11 ++---------
> kernel/acpi/Makefile | 11 ++---------
> kernel/acpi/acpica/Makefile | 12 ++----------
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> index 5f4096d..a4c0582 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> @@ -2,15 +2,8 @@
> # Makefile for the Linux ACPI Drivers
> #
>
> -export ACPI_CFLAGS
> -
> -ACPI_CFLAGS := -Os
> -
> -ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG
> - ACPI_CFLAGS += -DACPI_DEBUG_OUTPUT
> -endif
> -
> -EXTRA_CFLAGS += $(ACPI_CFLAGS)
> +ccflags-y := -Os
> +ccflags-$(CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG) += -DACPI_DEBUG_OUTPUT
The conversion from ACPI_CFLAGS to ccflags-y is fine.
And if acpi really require -Os then this part is also OK -
I just did not get *why* acpi needs -Os
On the assumption the the -Os requirement is a hard requirement:
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
[For the full patch - I just quoted the first part]
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists