linux-kernel - Re: swiotlb: Add missing _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <adak59dpc81.fsf@cisco.com>
Date:	Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:36:14 -0800
From:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: swiotlb: Add missing __init annotations

 > no need - so it wasnt needed to make a section warning go away - i.e. your 
 > patch sans the last hunk is tested to solve the problem, right?

I hadn't tested without that hunk... so I just redid it.  For
simplicity, here's the exact patch I just tested to solve the warnings:

===

The current kernel build warns:

    WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x11458): Section mismatch in reference from the function swiotlb_alloc_boot() to the function .init.text:__alloc_bootmem_low()
    The function swiotlb_alloc_boot() references
    the function __init __alloc_bootmem_low().
    This is often because swiotlb_alloc_boot lacks a __init
    annotation or the annotation of __alloc_bootmem_low is wrong.
    
    WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1011f2): Section mismatch in reference from the function swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size() to the function .init.text:__alloc_bootmem_low()
    The function swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size() references
    the function __init __alloc_bootmem_low().
    This is often because swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size lacks a __init
    annotation or the annotation of __alloc_bootmem_low is wrong.

and indeed the functions calling __alloc_bootmem_low() can be marked
__init as well.

Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb_64.c |    2 +-
 lib/swiotlb.c                    |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb_64.c
index 242c344..8cba374 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb_64.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 
 int swiotlb __read_mostly;
 
-void *swiotlb_alloc_boot(size_t size, unsigned long nslabs)
+void * __init swiotlb_alloc_boot(size_t size, unsigned long nslabs)
 {
 	return alloc_bootmem_low_pages(size);
 }
diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c
index fa2dc4e..f684d55 100644
--- a/lib/swiotlb.c
+++ b/lib/swiotlb.c
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ setup_io_tlb_npages(char *str)
 __setup("swiotlb=", setup_io_tlb_npages);
 /* make io_tlb_overflow tunable too? */
 
-void * __weak swiotlb_alloc_boot(size_t size, unsigned long nslabs)
+void * __weak __init swiotlb_alloc_boot(size_t size, unsigned long nslabs)
 {
 	return alloc_bootmem_low_pages(size);
 }
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ swiotlb_init(void)
  * initialize the swiotlb later using the slab allocator if needed.
  * This should be just like above, but with some error catching.
  */
-int
+int __init
 swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size(size_t default_size)
 {
 	unsigned long i, bytes, req_nslabs = io_tlb_nslabs;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/