[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090102094934.GB17841@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 04:49:34 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Embedded Linux mailing list <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH [0/3]: Simplify the kernel build by removing perl.
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:26:37AM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Friday 02 of January 2009, Rob Landley wrote:
> > Before 2.6.25 (specifically git bdc807871d58285737d50dc6163d0feb72cb0dc2 )
> > building a Linux kernel never required perl to be installed on the build
> > system. (Various development and debugging scripts were written in perl
> > and python and such, but they weren't involved in actually building a
> > kernel.) Building a kernel before 2.6.25 could be done with a minimal
> > system built from gcc, binutils, bash, make, busybox, uClibc, and the Linux
> > kernel, and nothing else.
>
> And now bash is going to be required... while some distros don't need/have
> bash. /bin/sh should be enough.
*nod* bash is in many ways a worse requirement than perl. strict posix
/bin/sh + awk + sed would be nicest, but if that's too much work perl
seems reasonable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists