[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <45153060-F5A5-44BE-B2A0-C995E65ACE9C@mirell.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 04:03:47 -0600
From: Mark Miller <mark@...ell.org>
To: Mark Miller <mark@...ell.org>
Cc: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Embedded Linux mailing list <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH [0/3]: Simplify the kernel build by removing perl.
On Jan 2, 2009, at 4:02 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On Jan 2, 2009, at 3:26 AM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
>
>> On Friday 02 of January 2009, Rob Landley wrote:
>>> Before 2.6.25 (specifically git
>>> bdc807871d58285737d50dc6163d0feb72cb0dc2 )
>>> building a Linux kernel never required perl to be installed on the
>>> build
>>> system. (Various development and debugging scripts were written
>>> in perl
>>> and python and such, but they weren't involved in actually
>>> building a
>>> kernel.) Building a kernel before 2.6.25 could be done with a
>>> minimal
>>> system built from gcc, binutils, bash, make, busybox, uClibc, and
>>> the Linux
>>> kernel, and nothing else.
>>
>> And now bash is going to be required... while some distros don't
>> need/have
>> bash. /bin/sh should be enough.
>
> Which distros only have /bin/sh which do not have Perl? I'm honestly
> curious.
That is, *do* have Perl. Typo there.
>
>
>> --
>> Arkadiusz MiĆkiewicz PLD/Linux Team
>> arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/
--
Mark Miller
mark@...ell.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists