linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] include/linux: Move definitions from usb.h to usb/ch9.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090102020121.GA9411@gamba.jf.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 1 Jan 2009 18:01:48 -0800
From:	Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
To:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>, gregkh@...e.de,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include/linux: Move definitions from usb.h to usb/ch9.h

On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 05:40:26PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 December 2008, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > so why move these functions to 
> > include/linux/usb/ch9.h?  Was it confusing to find these functions, or do you
> > have an overall plan for these changes?
> 
> You missed earlier mail on the topic.  The basic issue is
> that those symbols can (and should!) be used for peripheral
> side support as well as host side support ... which means
> they should never have been put into a host-only header.

Ah, I see.  Thanks for the explanation. :)

Sarah
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/