[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1230981761.27180.10.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 12:22:41 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 15:46 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> * Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> [2009-01-03 08:29:25]:
>
> > On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 23:16 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > Mike, would you be interesting in having a look at sched_mc=2 as a
> > > kernel-wide default - and give it your blessing if you find it to be a net
> > > improvement for the various performance and interactivity tests you do?
> >
> > Sure.
>
> Thanks Mike and Ingo. I will be glad to help with test and benchmarks
> on the platforms that I have access.
>
> I am presently working on sysbench.
The testing I can do is rather severely limited since I have only one
Q6600. I butchered mc_capable() to use what I can though, ie see if
SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE still harms tbench and mysql+oltp. I think that's
about all I can do on my wee box.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists